TCCON and NDACC XCO measurements: difference, discussion and application - Centre de recherche Saint-Antoine - UMR S938 Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Année : 2019

TCCON and NDACC XCO measurements: difference, discussion and application

Minqiang Zhou
Huilin Chen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Rigel Kivi
Pauli Heikkinen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Voltaire Velazco
Mathias Palm
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 981899

Résumé

Column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO (X CO) measurements are obtained from two ground-based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer networks: the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). In this study, the differences between the TCCON and NDACC X CO measurements are investigated and discussed based on six NDACC-TCCON sites using data over the period 2007-2017. A direct comparison shows that the NDACC X CO measurements are about 5.5 % larger than the TCCON data at Ny-Ålesund, Bremen, and Izaña (North-ern Hemisphere), and the absolute bias between the NDACC and TCCON data is within 2 % at Saint-Denis, Wollongong and Lauder (Southern Hemisphere). The hemispheric dependence of the bias is mainly attributed to their smoothing errors. The systematic smoothing error of the TCCON X CO data varies in the range between 0.2 % (Bremen) and 7.9 % (Lauder), and the random smoothing error varies in the range between 2.0 % and 3.6 %. The systematic smoothing error of NDACC data is between 0.1 % and 0.8 %, and the random smoothing error of NDACC data is about 0.3 %. For TCCON data, the smoothing error is significant because it is higher than the reported uncertainty, particularly at Southern Hemisphere sites. To reduce the influence from the a priori profiles and different vertical sensitivities, the scaled NDACC a priori profiles are used as the common a priori profiles for comparing TCCON and NDACC retrievals. As a result, the biases between TCCON and NDACC X CO measurements become more consistent (5.6 %-8.5 %) with a mean value of 6.8 % at these sites. To determine the sources of the remaining bias, regular AirCore measurements at Orléans and Sodankylä are compared to co-located TCCON measurements. It is found that TCCON X CO measurements are 6.1 ± 1.6 % and 8.0 ± 3.2 % smaller than the AirCore measurements at Orléans and Sodankylä, respectively, indicating that the scaling factor of TCCON X CO data should be around 1.0000 instead of 1.0672. Further investigations should be carried out in the TCCON community to determine the correct scaling factor to Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 5980 M. Zhou et al.: TCCON and NDACC X CO measurements be applied to the TCCON X CO data. This paper also demonstrates that the smoothing error must be taken into account when comparing FTIR X CO data, and especially TCCON X CO data, with model or satellite data.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
amt-12-5979-2019.pdf (3.81 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-02414324 , version 1 (16-09-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Minqiang Zhou, Bavo Langerock, Corinne Vigouroux, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Christian Hermans, et al.. TCCON and NDACC XCO measurements: difference, discussion and application. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, 12 (11), pp.5979-5995. ⟨10.5194/amt-12-5979-2019⟩. ⟨hal-02414324⟩
141 Consultations
42 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More