S. Andrews, Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.18, issue.2, pp.234-254, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234

S. Andrews, The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.76, issue.4, pp.439-461, 1997.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03214334

M. Coltheart, E. Davelaar, J. F. Jonasson, D. Besner, and N. J. Hillsdale, Access to the internal lexicon, Attention and Performance VI, pp.535-555, 1977.

A. Content, P. Mousty, and M. &radeau, BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, pp.551-556, 1990.

K. I. Forster and D. Shen, No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.22, issue.3, pp.696-713, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696

J. Grainger and A. M. Jacobs, Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model., Psychological Review, vol.103, issue.3, pp.518-565, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518

J. Grainger, J. K. O-'regan, A. M. Jacobs, and J. Segui, On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect, Etudes statistiques sur le vocabulaire français: Dictionnaire des fréquences, pp.189-195, 1971.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03210696

A. M. Jacobs and J. Grainger, Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.18, issue.4, pp.1174-1188, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1174

N. F. Johnson and K. R. &pugh, A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition, Cognitive Psychology, vol.26, issue.3, pp.240-346, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1994.1008

S. Mathey, L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, pp.1-23, 2001.
DOI : 10.1037/h0087349

S. Mathey and D. Zagar, The neighborhood distribution effect in visual word recognition: Words with single and twin neighbors., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.26, issue.1, pp.184-205, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.184

J. L. Mcclelland and D. E. Rumelhart, An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part I. An Account of Basic Findings, Psychological Review, vol.88, pp.375-407, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50048-0

J. G. Raaijmakers, A further look at the "language-as-fixed-effect fallacy"., Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie exp??rimentale, vol.57, issue.3, pp.141-151, 2003.
DOI : 10.1037/h0087421

J. G. Raaijmakers, J. M. Schrijnemakers, and F. Gremmen, How to Deal with ???The Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy???: Common Misconceptions and Alternative Solutions, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.41, issue.3, pp.416-426, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/jmla.1999.2650

P. D. Siakaluk, C. R. Sears, and S. J. Lupker, Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: The effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.28, issue.3, pp.661-681, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.661

E. L. Wike and J. D. Church, Comments on Clark's ???The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy???, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.15, issue.3, pp.249-255, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90023-2

D. Zagar and S. &mathey, Revisiting the neighborhood size effect in visual word recognition, 1999.

D. Zagar and S. Mathey, When words with higher-frequency neighbours become words with no higher-frequency neighbours, Reading as a perceptual process, pp.23-46, 2000.

J. C. Ziegler and C. Perry, No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task, Cognition, vol.68, issue.2, pp.53-62, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X