Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue International Journal of Food Science and Technology Année : 2012

Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science

(1, 2) , (3) , (3) , (4)
1
2
3
4

Résumé

For food scientists and industrials, descriptive profiling is an essential tool that involves the evaluation of both the qualitative and quantitative sensory characteristics of a product by a panel. Recently, in response to industrial demands to develop faster and more cost-effective methods of descriptive analysis, several methods have been offered as alternatives to conventional profiling. These methods can be classified in three families: (i) verbal-based methods (flash profile and check-all-that-apply), (ii) similarity-based methods (free sorting task and projective mapping aka Napping (R)) and (iii) reference-based methods (polarised sensory positioning and pivot profile). We successively present these three classes of methods in terms of origin, principles, statistical analysis, applications to food products, variations of the methods and the Pros and Cons.

Dates et versions

hal-00723390 , version 1 (09-08-2012)

Identifiants

Citer

Dominique Valentin, Sylvie Chollet, Maud Lelièvre, Hervé Abdi. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2012, 47 (8), pp.1563-1578. ⟨10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x⟩. ⟨hal-00723390⟩
98 Consultations
1 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More