 |
 |
Article dans une revue
Comparing simultaneous integrated boost vs sequential boost in anal cancer patients: results of a retrospective observational study
Abstract : Background
To evaluate clinical outcomes of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) - intensity modulated radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non metastatic anal cancer compared to those of a set of patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal RT and sequential boost (SeqB).
Methods
A retrospective cohort of 190 anal cancer patients treated at 3 academic centers with concurrent chemo-RT employing either SIB or SeqB was analysed. The SIB-group consisted of 87 patients, treated with 2 cycles of Mitomycin (MMC) and 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) using SIB-IMRT delivering 42-45Gy/28–30 fractions to the elective pelvic lymph nodes and 50.4-54Gy/28-30fractions to the primary tumor and involved nodes, based on pre-treatment staging. The SeqB group comprised 103 patients, treated with MMC associated to either 5FU or Capecitabine concurrent to RT with 36 Gy/20 fractions to a single volume including gross tumor, clinical nodes and elective nodal volumes and a SeqB to primary tumor and involved nodes of 23.4 Gy/13 fractions. We compared colostomy-free survival (CFS), overall survival (OS) and the cumulative incidence of colostomy for each radiation modality. Cox proportional-hazards model addressed factors influencing OS and CFS.
Results
Median follow up was 34 (range 9–102) and 31 months (range 2–101) in the SIB and SeqB groups. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of colostomy were 8.2% (95%CI:3.6–15.2) and 15.0% (95%CI:8.1–23.9) in the SIB group and 13.9% (95%CI: 7.8–21.8) and 18.1% (95%CI:10.8–27.0) in the SeqB group. Two-year CFS and OS were 78.1% (95%CI:67.0–85.8) and 87.5% (95%CI:77.3–93.3) in the SIB group and 73.5% (95%CI:62.6–81.7) and 85.4% (95%CI:75.5–91.6) in the SeqB, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression model highlighted an adjusted hazard ratio (AdjHR) of 1.18 (95%CI: 0.67–2.09;p = 0.560), although AdjHR for the first 24 months was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.49–1.84;p = 0.877) for the SIB approach.
Conclusions
SIB-based RT provides similar clinical outcomes compared to SeqB-based in the treatment of patients affected with non metastatic anal cancer.
Keywords :
Epidermoid Carcinoma
Mitomycin-C
Radiotherapy
European Organization
Local-Control
Anal cancer radiotherapy
Simultaneous integrated boost
Sequential boost
Overall treatment time
Concomitant radio-chemotherapy
Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups
Modulated Radiation-Therapy
Squamous-Cell Carcinoma
Concurrent Chemotherapy
Treatment Time
https://hal-univ-bourgogne.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01927873
Contributeur : Le2i - Université de Bourgogne <>
Soumis le : mardi 20 novembre 2018 - 10:56:31
Dernière modification le : mercredi 14 octobre 2020 - 04:02:13
Contributeur : Le2i - Université de Bourgogne <>
Soumis le : mardi 20 novembre 2018 - 10:56:31
Dernière modification le : mercredi 14 octobre 2020 - 04:02:13
Lien texte intégral
